Ken Lammers does a nice job of collecting up some of the shortcomings of the just-announced Apple iPad. I don’t get it either. The iPad seems really limited.
My iPhone has similar limitations—no multitasking, no USB or FireWire, a closed application deployment mechanism—but it’s a cell phone: Making it more flexible would come at the risk of making it less reliable. But in a general-purpose computer, I want a lot more flexibility, and I can live with the reliability problems the come with it. (Yes, I am a Windows user. How did you guess?)
If I still traveled for business, I might appreciate an iPad as an on-the-go email and surfing computer, but the touch keyboard probably isn’t adequate for typing long email messages. As a photographer, I’d love to have a small computer that I could use to preview and backup my digital photos, but there’s no way to attach an external camera.
I can almost hear the Apple true believers sputtering about how wrong I am: The iPad has both a keyboard and a camera connection kit available as accessories. Well, yes, but since the iPad only supports the proprietary Apple connector, you have to use Apple’s keyboards. If they’d put a USB port on the iPad, it could use any of hundreds of popular keyboards.
The camera situation is no better. Instead of USB or FireWire, you have to use the iPad Camera Connection Kit, which offers you two modules for transfering images. One of them is an SD card reader, which is kind of a ripoff considering that cell phones far less powerful than the iPhone—let alone the iPad—have had built-in SD card readers for years.
The other camera connection module is even more galling: It’s a USB adapter that allows you to connect the iPad to your camera’s USB port. You know what else would have allowed you to connect your iPad to your camera’s USB port? A USB port built into the iPad.
It seems like a really frustrating design. It might have made a nice way to accept and transport large specifications documents and image files I get when I visit clients, if only it had a filesystem to store and organize them. If I were a musician, the iPad would be an awesome tool for recording and remixing music, but there’s no way to attach a digitizer or a midi keyboard. If I were a video producer, the iPad would be a nice way edit together simple videos, such as a video blog, but there’s no way to pull in video from a camera.
Granted, I’m not a visionary genius like Steve Jobs, and perhaps by this time next year I’ll be raving about the wonders of my cool new iPad, but I just don’t see it…
And for those who are thinking about getting it instead of a Kindle for an e-reader, my comments are here.
Thanks, you make some good points.
Well, I think a little differently, I’m afraid. For me, the ability to surf, write, text, draw, play, etc. in a format large enough for these 52 year old eyes, but not as large or heavy as a laptop is ideal. The webcam will be built-in shortly, I believe. And reading in color is itself valuable. The kindle my wife has is useless for me on long overnight flights without additional lighting.
Both my daughters (20 & 11) have already expressed desires. So too my mother.
But, like every tech product, different strokes.
Came here from SJ. Am enjoying the browse, especially the statistics, which, as a mathematician, I can absolutely tell you is not inconsistent with reality.