• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

One Letter Too Far…

December 22, 2008 By Mark Draughn 5 Comments

Eric Wallace at Illinois Review just suggested that the next U.S. Senator from Illinois should follow what he calls the “L.I.F.T. Principles for governing.” The acronym stands for:

  • Limited Government
  • Individual Liberty and Responsibility
  • Free Enterprise
  • Traditional Values

Ah, the old libertarian-conservative schism is still there.  He had me through L.I.F. but then he had to go and throw in some traditional values.

Those first three principles give some pretty clear guidance about what government should and should not be doing, but Traditional Values isn’t really a principle at all. It’s a kind of placeholder for a bunch of other things including,

Traditional family values must be preserved and impressed upon each generation. Duty, honor and love of country are some of those values…Marriage is intended to be a permanent relationship between one man and one woman and is a foundation for healthy and stable families…

As usual, it’s the conservative sell-out of libertarians. It’s all Limited Government and Individual Liberty and Responsibility unless you want to do something they think is icky.

I’ve never really understood that part of the Conservative agenda—the part where they’re standing “athwart history, yelling Stop” as William F. Buckley put it. Why stop here? Why stop now? What makes the recent past so great that we should stay there?

Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork took a lot of crap for his views during his confirmation, but at least he made it clear he thought we’ve been going downhill since the Reformation. If you’re going to demand a return to something as vague as traditional values, at least qualify it—Traditional Values (American Midwest, 1945, white Protestants)—so we know what you mean.

Although, really, we all know what you mean.

Share This Post

Filed Under: Freedom

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dr X says

    December 22, 2008 at 10:41 pm

    I’ve always suspected that conservatives don’t really care all that much about L, I and F when push comes to shove. It’s all about their concept of T, which means that L, I and F will be sacrificed to T in a heartbeat if it serves to further their version of T.

    Reply
  2. Lil Spicy says

    December 23, 2008 at 9:41 am

    Well said Dr. X…..I agree 100%

    Reply
  3. Mark Draughn says

    December 23, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Yeah, Doc, that’s one of the things that’s kept me out of the conservative movement. I just don’t see the connections they see.

    Reply
  4. David A. says

    December 23, 2008 at 7:52 pm

    Conservative, Liberal, Green party…who cares? As long as the new Senator is able to bring home the pork and make my life better, I don’t care what his political stripes are. It is all about the Benjies; show me the money!!!

    Reply
  5. Mark Draughn says

    December 23, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    That’s certainly a popular approach. Have you considered moving to Alaska? I hear they’ve done some ground-breaking work in this area.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE
  • Late night thoughts on the current crisis
  • Joining The Cult
  • Trump’s dumb attempt to define sex
  • Some advice for my transgender readers in the new year
  • Decoding Economics: Happiness and Taste
  • Decoding Economics: The Real Economy

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Follow

  • X
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • Agitator
  • DrugWar Rant
  • Duly Noted
  • Dynamist
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Blawgs

  • a Public Defender
  • appellatesquawk
  • Blonde Justice
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Defending People
  • DUI Blog
  • ECIL Crime
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Hercules and the Umpire
  • Indefensible
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Probable Cause
  • Seeking Justice
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Clements Firm
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate
  • West Virginia Criminal Law Blog

Bloggers

  • Booker Rising
  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Miss Manners
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Roger Ebert's Journal
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Altruist
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Gone But Not Forgotten

  • Peter McWilliams

Copyright © 2025 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress

Go to mobile version