• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Drug in the Workplace, Part 1

August 22, 2006 By Mark Draughn 1 Comment

Pete Guither asks us to help put together a challenge to a page at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) called Drugs in the Workplace—What an employer needs to know.

I’ll start with the third sentence, which includes this: “77 percent of illicit drug users in the United States are employed.” Since the employment rate in the general population is only 63 percent, it appears that illicit drug users work harder than the non-drug-using population. That’s skewed by the fact that women, the very young, and the very old have a lower labor force participation rate and also use illicit drugs less. Still, if you look at the breakdown by age and sex, illicit drug users post some pretty good numbers.

More seriously, the page has an interesting breakdown in credibility about half-way through. The first half discusses the problems caused by workplace substance abuse and gives actual quantitative answers in dollars and percentages and relative likelyhoods of certain outcomes. The references aren’t the greatest—secondary publications rather than scientific studies or reliable statistics—but still, they’re laying it all out for us to see.

The second half tries to answer the question “What can your organization do to decrease the impact of substance abuse?” The answer they give is “Implement a drug-free workplace program.” But this section of the document contains no references or statistics of any kind. They were quick to give statistics for the dangers of drug use, but appear to have nothing to prove that implementing a drug-free workplace program is actually effective.

I haven’t even begun to describe the fundamental problem with the SAMHSA page. That will be a longer article, which will have to wait until I’m less busy.

Share This Post

Filed Under: War On Drugs

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Terry says

    July 9, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    There are hundreds of studies that can be found all over the internet that come to the conclusion that a drug free workplace saves a company in many areas.

    You will see a reduction in time missed, you will have less accidents, you will have fewer medical claims and your workers comp rate will go down.

    The best way to implement a plan is by using instant drug screens for onsite testing. You will get faster results, reduce the time to hire and in the case of a non-negative result you still have the backing of a lab and an MRO.

    Instant tests cost %60 less than lab tests and are just as accurate and do not increase your liability or risk.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE
  • Late night thoughts on the current crisis
  • Joining The Cult
  • Trump’s dumb attempt to define sex

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Follow

  • X
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • Agitator
  • DrugWar Rant
  • Duly Noted
  • Dynamist
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Blawgs

  • a Public Defender
  • appellatesquawk
  • Blonde Justice
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Defending People
  • DUI Blog
  • ECIL Crime
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Hercules and the Umpire
  • Indefensible
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Probable Cause
  • Seeking Justice
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Clements Firm
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate
  • West Virginia Criminal Law Blog

Bloggers

  • Booker Rising
  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Miss Manners
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Roger Ebert's Journal
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Altruist
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Gone But Not Forgotten

  • Peter McWilliams

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress

Go to mobile version