• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

The Full Frame Myth

December 18, 2005 By Mark Draughn Leave a Comment

Over in the Digital Photography Review Forums, some people are badmouthing the Nikon D200 camera because it’s not full frame. What they mean is that, like most Digital SLR cameras, the sensor isn’t as large as the standard 35mm frame size used in a film camera. I’ve only been learning about photogaphy for about a year, but I’m pretty sure that although this is true, it’s also a bit of misdirection.

What’s true is that the digital image sensor is indeed about 2/3 the size of a 35mm frame. It’s also true that if the sensor was as large as a 35mm frame, it would produce better images. A 35mm frame is 50% larger in each dimension, meaning a sensor that size could capture twice as many pixels. Or, and this would be my preference, it could have the same number of pixels, each with twice the light-gathering area, giving an extra stop of sensitivity for the same noise level. (That is, not more pixels, but better pixels.) The thing is, however, there’s nothing magically wonderful about the 35mm frame size. When it comes to the imaging quality of digital sensors, bigger is always better.

The same is true of film. In fact, 35mm film is the rock-bottom film size that is considered suitable for professional use. (If you know what APS, 110, 126, and 8x11mm films are, congratulations, but those have never been used professionally and are respectively dying, nearly dead, dead, and used only by spies.) Photographers who want really nice images don’t use 35mm, they use one of the medium format sizes built on a strip of film 6cm wide. Photographers who want better images use 4×5 inch film sheets. For even better images they can use 5×7 inch film. Or if that’s not good enough, there’s 8×10 inch film. And if that’s not good enough, there are even larger specialty film sizes.

I’ve heard that the 35mm format was chosen because the same format is used in 35mm movie film, so it was being produced in large amounts which made it cheap. Even if that’s not true, the 35mm format is simply an engineering compromise between image quality, camera size, and cost. Digital imaging sensors are designed with the same sort of tradeoffs, but being a different technology, they’ve settled around a different common size.

The point is, there’s nothing special about the 35mm film size.

Update: Well, the one thing 35mm has going for it is that every camera maker has a lot of lenses that work with 35mm. Then again, those lenses will also work with smaller formats as well, including all Digital SLR sensor sizes. Still, the 35mm format is the largest format that will work with readily available consumer lenses.

Share This Post

Filed Under: Photography

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE
  • Late night thoughts on the current crisis
  • Joining The Cult
  • Trump’s dumb attempt to define sex
  • Some advice for my transgender readers in the new year
  • Decoding Economics: Happiness and Taste
  • Decoding Economics: The Real Economy

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Follow

  • X
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • Agitator
  • DrugWar Rant
  • Duly Noted
  • Dynamist
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Blawgs

  • a Public Defender
  • appellatesquawk
  • Blonde Justice
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Defending People
  • DUI Blog
  • ECIL Crime
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Hercules and the Umpire
  • Indefensible
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Probable Cause
  • Seeking Justice
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Clements Firm
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate
  • West Virginia Criminal Law Blog

Bloggers

  • Booker Rising
  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Miss Manners
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Roger Ebert's Journal
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Altruist
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Gone But Not Forgotten

  • Peter McWilliams

Copyright © 2025 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress

Go to mobile version