It’s been a long time since I took any pictures for my Eminent Domain photo essay series, but my contact with the IJ a few months ago got me energized to do some more shooting. I was up in Wisconsin around that time, and while I was there I stopped by Hartung Quarry, which is the site of an emerging eminent domain story.
Here’s one picture I didn’t take, courtesy of Google Earth, to set the scene:
Actually, “quarry” is deceptive. This place used to be a quarry, but whatever they took out of there, they finished decades ago. Then they started filling it with trash. It’s really the Hartung Quarry Landfill, like the sign says:
Larger ImageSigns |
That’s down at the south end by the entrance. Here’s an establishing shot:
Larger ImageLandfill Entrance |
As you can see, it’s not a big hole in the ground. That’s because the landfill is almost full. By January 2007, there won’t be any more room. At that point, the City of Milwaukee will convert it to a park.
In fact, the city has been pretty smart about all this. They’ve been planning the park since Hartung opened as a landfill, so they’ve been careful to dump only clean waste. There’s no need for a clay cap and monitoring of fumes. They can just cover it with soil, lay some grass over it, and it’s a park.
That’s not the eminent domain issue. The city already owns the land. Besides, landfills and parks are ordinary public uses for eminent domain. The city plan does include a few lots to be developed, and I wouldn’t be shocked if that involved some behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing, but since the land has seen public use for decades, it seems unlikely that it’s all been a cover for a private land grab.
The motivation for the eminent domain buyout comes instead from local residents. According to a December 27, 2005 account in the Milwaukee Daily Reporter (not available free online):
The city-owned landfill is completely surrounded by a classic suburban single-family neighborhood. The Hartung Park Neighborhood Association wants the city to convert the landfill into a public park, but first it wants the city to acquire and rip down the neighborhood’s five remaining apartment buildings, located on North 99th Street. It also wants to see a cul-de-sac of owner-occupied houses built in their place.
They’re talking about a group of buildings on the northeast corner of the quarry. I’ve marked them here in this Google Earth image:
As I was planning my trip, I was half expecting to find some goofy bit of low-income housing with towering apartment buildings in the middle of a peaceful neighborhood. Instead, I found this:
Larger Image3450 N 99th St |
Not a single-family home, but not a bad looking place. Well-maintained, with sculpted bushes and a smooth well-maintained driveway.
To be fair, that’s probably the best looking of the five properties. I think this is probably the worst looking one:
Larger Image3473, 3475, 3477, and 3479 N 99th St |
Here’s a closer look at the worst of the damage.
Larger ImageClose-up of 3473, 3475, 3477, and 3479 N 99th St |
So some of the buildings are a bit unsightly, but a few maintenance problems are hardly cause for eminent domain action are they? Nope. This is something else.
“We know there’s all this crap going on up there,” said Margaret Silkey, president of the roughly 45-member association. “We just want to keep the neighborhood a decent, viable place and not have it become a run-down area.”
Whatever she’s talking about, it’s not the buildings themselves.
Larger Image3457, 3459, 3461, and 3463 N 99th St |
There’s really not a lot to see here. I mean, take a look at this place:
Larger Image3465, 3467, 3469, and 3471 N 99th St |
Yes, it looks unsightly because they’ve got all that trash piled out front. But when you step around that and take a look at the building, you see neatly trimmed lawns, a well-maintained facade, and sculpted bushes and trees.
Larger Image3465, 3467, 3469, and 3471 N 99th St |
Or take a look at the rear of one of the other houses:
Larger Image3473, 3475, 3477, and 3479 N 99th St |
Again, I’ve chosen an unflattering angle. The grass around the storage shed is a little unkempt, and there’s a box that didn’t fit in the trash cans.. On the other hand, the storage shed itself is well-maintained. Here’s a reverse angle to show how nice the place is kept.
Larger Image3473, 3475, 3477, and 3479 N 99th St |
There just isn’t much to see here. Even the eminent domain threat is mostly theoretical:
The local alderman, Jim Bohl, is sponsoring a resolution to order the Department of City Development to plan for a tax incremental financing district to pay for the new park. The plan includes acquiring the five, four-family apartment buildings around the landfill and redeveloping the lots.
Although the resolution orders DCD to make a “good-faith effort” to do that without using eminent domain, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett said he doesn’t want to touch the idea of acquiring the properties for redevelopment.
And that’s it. I took these pictures months ago and just sat on them, because I thought I’d try to go back to Milwaukee and get a better story, but I haven’t had the time and probably won’t. So, for now, it’s just some people living in rental apartments, and the remarkably unsympathetic Ms. Silkey’s desire to get rid of them.
I could show you the rear of some of the other buildings…
Larger Image3473, 3475, 3477, and 3479 N 99th St |
…or show you another smooth driveway…
Larger Image3457 N 99th St |
But what would be the point? (Other than posting them just because I’ve got them, and I’ve already done enough of that, don’t you think?)
I figured I had the pictures so I might as well post them. There are a lot more pictures of the Hartung Quarry Landfill eminent domain area if anybody wants to use them.
Deb says
I know this website is pretty old. It’s now Nov 2010. Sorry, but these properties don’t alway look so good. Grass is not cut for a month at a time, constantly overflowing garbage carts that stay out at curbside, which is a city ordinance violation, broken windows, junked cars in front, etc. The residents are too lazy to wheel the garbage carts back behind the bldg after garbage pickup, but they have plenty of time to sit on their front stoops and suck beer. These properties had gotten so bad with bldg code violations, the City of Milwaukee brought in city workers this year to correct these numerous violations. The city had contacted the out of town non resident (surprised?) owner numerous times to no avail. He is basicaly a suburban slumlord that is getting federal dollars to have subsidized housing. The first photo of these multi family units is owner occupied. It’s obvious the owner takes pride in his property. We are all of very modest incomes in this area, but we work our butts off to keep up our properties.
Don says
Deb,
You are a great story teller, people sitting in front sucking beers? junk cars left on the street? The city of Milwaukee workers where sent in the correct these issues?
Wow, we must all be blind. The city workers where there to trim the trees that were over growing from the quarry, the owner of one of the buildings had been contacting the DPW and forestry department for close to 4 years about those trees that grow along the fence and constantly got the run around about who was responsible for them (the Parks Dept or DPW) some of the trees actually fell on cars in the parking lots and blocked entry to the drives.
Yes one of the buildings has a pretty regular turn around of tenants which makes for some unsightly trash build up. But when you call the city for a special pickup of the trash it takes 2 or 3 weeks before they send a crew to pick it up. And the property owner is charged for the pickup as well.
Abandoned cars on the street are clearly not legal and if someone sees one they should report so the city can tow it away.
The park they built which I refer to as Weed Park, is a complete joke. They have some playground equipment on the corner and hills of weeds. The city replaced the street and put in sidewalks and grass along the quarry fence line and just lets the grass grow, it’s been going on 3 months and they haven’t looked at it.
calling people slumlords for renting to people who may not be able to afford owning a home in this economy is unfair and your Subsidized Housing comment reeks of racial profiling. People who rent in these buildings work their butts off as well to live in a nice area.