• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

A Great Idea From the Instapundit

July 28, 2006 By Mark Draughn 1 Comment

Glenn Reynolds blogged the arrested-for-photographing-the-cops story too. Of course, he did it earlier.

In his commentary, he offers this terrific idea:

I think we need civil rights legislation making this kind of arrest illegal. Treble damages, plus the right to civil forfeiture of any police property or equipment used in the arrest. Oh, and respondeat superior liability against supervisors.

I don’t even know what that last thing is, but civil forfeiture of police property is a great idea.

Think about it. Police departments all over the country have been earning a sizable income by seizing the assets of criminals. There’s clear evidence that police make choices about which criminals to go after based on how much stuff they can take. This is why you get a lot of silly small-time pot busts: Ordinary citizens own valuable stuff, whereas drug dealers are careful to hide their assets with friends or family members.

Isn’t it only fair that these same police departments should themselves be subject to asset seizure when they break the law? Maybe it would give some of them cause for thought when they’re planning a raid if violating peoples’ rights meant the police could lose the battering ram they used to break down the door, the communications gear used to coordinate the raid, and the police cars they drove to get to the raid site.

Filed Under: Legal

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jason Sonenshein says

    July 29, 2006 at 12:24 pm

    “I don’t even know what that last thing is…”

    I think it means that if a police officer violates your rights, then under Professor Reynolds’ proposal, the supervisory officers up the chain of command of the officer who violated your rights would be on the hook, too.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Swift Falling
  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress