• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Can’t Deduct Defense?

December 29, 2010 By Mark Draughn 2 Comments

It’s a good question, really…

Over at Popehat, Patrick has this to say about Joel Rosenberg’s defense fund:

Note that this is not tax-deductible. The government does not encourage its subjects to stand up for the blameless.

Well, why the hell not?

As far as I can tell, the tax rule for legal expenses is that the expenses are tax deductible only if they are business or income related. Criminal defense is considered neither, so criminal defense fees are not tax deductible. Which is kind of odd when you consider that it’s pretty hard to earn a living if the government throws your ass in jail.

Also, the need for criminal defense arises from the government’s own legal actions. It seems cruel to force the defendent to pay taxes to the government for the cost of defending himself from that same government.

Of course, if you do try to deduct your criminal defense fees, and the IRS comes after you, your tax defense expenses are tax deductible.

Filed Under: Legal

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John David Galt says

    December 29, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    I’m a registered tax preparer in California.

    If you really want to be able to deduct the expenses, then sue your persecutors (pun intended) for money damages alongside whatever criminal case is pending. So long as the judgment you are attempting to collect would be taxable income, the part of attorneys’ fees and expenses that apply to the lawsuit are deductible.

    Reply
  2. Mark Draughn says

    December 29, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    I don’t know who the heck you are, John Galt, but thanks for the information.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Swift Falling
  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress