• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Tea Party Ethos Up in Smoke

October 16, 2010 By Ken Gibson 2 Comments

Attorney General Eric Holder has announced, as expected, that the Department of Justice will not let Proposition 19, which would legalize marijuana in California, stop them from waging the War on Drugs Which Are Less Harmful Than Alcohol and Nicotine in their never ending effort to fill up prisons across the nation. I expected that response from the Feds.

I’ve been browsing through some Tea Party sites and other forums in California and what I didn’t expect was the knee-jerk opposition to Proposition 19 from them. It seems an ideal issue for the Tea Party people. The federal government taking away the rights of the local people of California by imposing big government wasteful spending.
When the Tea Party people speak in generalities I sometimes like their ideas. When they get into specific issues, however, they are repulsive, hypocritical morons.

Filed Under: War On Drugs

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mark Draughn says

    October 19, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    I’ve avoided commenting on Tea Party policies because I’m not convinced they’re organized enough to have a coherent policy. That is, I have trouble imagining a sentence I could write that begins “The Tea Party believes…” that ends in any useful observation about Tea Partiers.

    The media has been quick to talk to anyone who claims to be in charge at the Tea Party, and left wing pundits have been looking for all kinds of sinister people they can claim are backing the Tea Party, but I think that, like most outsider political movements, a lot of it is spontaneous, unplanned, and decentralized. Not that right wing politicians wasted any time trying to take charge, or at least look like they’re in charge.

    Reply
  2. Ken Gibson says

    October 20, 2010 at 9:15 am

    There’s certainly no central organization, yet, on the local level, they do emulate the usual party structures such as making for/against statements about issues. To see what the Tea Party “believes”, or, as I prefer to think of it, supports, you need to go check out the local websites and forums and see what the consensus seems to be.

    What they “believe” and what they (by consensus) “support” are often very different, as in this case. They “believe” in smaller government, yet “support” more police crackdowns for marijuana.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE
  • Late night thoughts on the current crisis

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress