• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Protecting Prostitutes, Part 2

April 23, 2005 By Mark Draughn 3 Comments

A few days ago, I wrote about the Predator Accountability Act being considered by the Illinois legislature. This bill would allow prostitutes to sue their pimps for damages. I pointed out a few problems with the bill.

After writing my little screed, it occurred to me that one defense of this bill is that it gives prostitutes access to the courts to obtain damages. Because prostitution is a crime, prostitutes generally don’t have much access to the courts, and lack of access to the courts is almost always a bad thing for people.

I believe economist David Friedman has suggested that providing an informal justice system for criminals is one of the reasons the Mafia exists. Think of Tony Soprano trying to resolve conflicts between his various lieutenants.

It stands to reason that allowing prostitutes to sue would therefore be a good thing, right? Well…

The problem is that the people who want to allow prostitutes to sue don’t really want them to have access to the courts. I know this because nothing in this act gives prostitutes access to the courts in the way that would be most important to them: The right to use the courts to collect from customers who don’t pay.

Or from agencies that don’t split the money like they promised.

I’m not suggesting we should create special rules that allow certain types of criminals to sue other criminals over difficulties carrying out their criminal conspiracy. That would be a huge departure from current law. People involved in criminal acts cannot usually sue over problems arising from those acts, and that’s how it should be.

What I’m suggesting is that best way to help prostitutes, if that’s really your goal, is to legalize prostitution.

Filed Under: Crime and Punishment

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Howard says

    April 16, 2006 at 10:47 pm

    This law may sound great for the “feminist” prohibition crowd, but that’s basically all it is, another form of prohibition laws dressed up to look like prostitute protection. And we all know how well prohibition turned out with alcohol and drugs.

    There is another precedent that indicates this law will be more public relations than serious policy. The federal anti-trafficking act has been around with great fanfare for five years. Hundreds of millions in funding has led to what? About one hundred prosecutions, low-level crap at five millions dollars per case?

    There are a lot of people who will profit from the new wave of prohibition laws, but it won’t be the women working in sex trade.

    See my site at http://www.streetwomen.org.
    for photos and audio of Chicago women in prostitution.

    Reply
  2. howard says

    April 16, 2006 at 10:55 pm

    In fact, while I’m at it, here’s a legislative idea that would do much more to help prostitutes and homeless women everywhere:

    1) Repeal laws denying education loans to drug offenders, since most street prostitutes have drug convictions.

    2) Oh yeah, and repeal laws denying housing, benefits and food stamps to drug offenders, see ibid, above.

    3) and maybe actually make living wage employment a real god damn PRIORITY for all low-income workers, including women, drug addicted, homeless or not. THEN MAYBE prostitutes will see a REASON TO LEAVE SEX WORK.

    This is called putting your money where your mouth is.

    Reply
  3. buy cheap auto insurance says

    September 12, 2013 at 12:36 am

    We are a group of volunteers and opening a bran new scheme iin
    our community. Your website offered us with helpfuyl information to
    work on. You have performed an impressive
    activity andd our entire community can be grateful to you.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Swift Falling
  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress