<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Everything Wrong With Feminist Anti-Sexwork Thinking In One Tweet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 17:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Draughn		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-25502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Draughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://windypundit.com/?p=9329#comment-25502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-25499&quot;&gt;Chuck&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the kind words. Judging by my blogs stats, I have no idea how to get writing to a larger audience.

Maybe I should get on that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-25499">Chuck</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words. Judging by my blogs stats, I have no idea how to get writing to a larger audience.</p>
<p>Maybe I should get on that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chuck		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-25499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://windypundit.com/?p=9329#comment-25499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like what you write, mostly (I don&#039;t care about Trump). I&#039;m wondering how to get good, clear writing to a larger audience. Having a blog is a start, but it&#039;s pretty limited. It might be that the audience for good material is saturated, but I don&#039;t think so. There is all kind of crap out there that could be shoveled into the garbage bin and no one would miss it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you write, mostly (I don&#8217;t care about Trump). I&#8217;m wondering how to get good, clear writing to a larger audience. Having a blog is a start, but it&#8217;s pretty limited. It might be that the audience for good material is saturated, but I don&#8217;t think so. There is all kind of crap out there that could be shoveled into the garbage bin and no one would miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Draughn		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-24666</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Draughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://windypundit.com/?p=9329#comment-24666</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-24665&quot;&gt;Wilson&lt;/a&gt;.

You see that a lot with actresses. Anne Hathaway opposes this Amnesty International policy, yet she&#039;s done a few sex scenes in films. I bet she&#039;d oppose a law making it illegal to show those films because she was exploited to make them. That&#039;s because she feels she&#039;s capable of making those decisions for herself, but she believes that other women aren&#039;t as intelligent and capable as her when it comes to drawing lines about using their sexuality to earn money, as evidenced by the fact that they go further than she does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-24665">Wilson</a>.</p>
<p>You see that a lot with actresses. Anne Hathaway opposes this Amnesty International policy, yet she&#8217;s done a few sex scenes in films. I bet she&#8217;d oppose a law making it illegal to show those films because she was exploited to make them. That&#8217;s because she feels she&#8217;s capable of making those decisions for herself, but she believes that other women aren&#8217;t as intelligent and capable as her when it comes to drawing lines about using their sexuality to earn money, as evidenced by the fact that they go further than she does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2015/08/everything-wrong-with-feminist-anti-sexwork-thinking-in-one-tweet/#comment-24665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://windypundit.com/?p=9329#comment-24665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dunham works as a prostitute herself, displaying her naked body,  staging sex scenes for money, and requiring other women to do it as well. By not letting other women access her large fortune she is also, by her kind of thinking, denying them choices and opportunities. So we see a 1) whore and pornographer passing herself off as a defender of sexual uprightness 2) an upper class exploiter passing herself off as a benefactor of the disadvantaged 3) a narcissist getting attention and inflating her self-image at others&#039; expense. Shouldn&#039;t society confiscate her money and confine her in an asylum to help her escape from these unhealthy behaviors and choices?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunham works as a prostitute herself, displaying her naked body,  staging sex scenes for money, and requiring other women to do it as well. By not letting other women access her large fortune she is also, by her kind of thinking, denying them choices and opportunities. So we see a 1) whore and pornographer passing herself off as a defender of sexual uprightness 2) an upper class exploiter passing herself off as a benefactor of the disadvantaged 3) a narcissist getting attention and inflating her self-image at others&#8217; expense. Shouldn&#8217;t society confiscate her money and confine her in an asylum to help her escape from these unhealthy behaviors and choices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-07-05 09:27:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->