<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Elliot Rodger&#8217;s Motive Says Very Little About Anyone Except Elliot Rodger	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 05:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Draughn		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/#comment-13566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Draughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 05:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windypundit.com/?p=7129#comment-13566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/#comment-13564&quot;&gt;Egalitarian&lt;/a&gt;.

All I can say is what I said in the post: I’ve heard that Rodger was a men’s rights activist. It&#039;s possible that the people I heard it from were wrong. As for what his beliefs have to do with men&#039;s rights, I don&#039;t know enough about his beliefs or the body of beliefs typical of the contemporary men&#039;s rights movement to make a judgement.

In any case, my general point was that spree shooters like him are so rare that they don&#039;t tell us anything meaningful about the groups they belong to. Even if his beliefs were in complete lockstep with the men&#039;s rights movement, then the men&#039;s rights movement might help explain his actions, but his actions wouldn&#039;t tell us anything meaningful about the men&#039;s rights movement, any more than it would tell us anything meaningful about gun owners, the mentally ill, mixed race asian/white people, BMW owners, UC Santa Barbara students, or &lt;em&gt;Game of Thrones&lt;/em&gt; fans.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/#comment-13564">Egalitarian</a>.</p>
<p>All I can say is what I said in the post: I’ve heard that Rodger was a men’s rights activist. It&#8217;s possible that the people I heard it from were wrong. As for what his beliefs have to do with men&#8217;s rights, I don&#8217;t know enough about his beliefs or the body of beliefs typical of the contemporary men&#8217;s rights movement to make a judgement.</p>
<p>In any case, my general point was that spree shooters like him are so rare that they don&#8217;t tell us anything meaningful about the groups they belong to. Even if his beliefs were in complete lockstep with the men&#8217;s rights movement, then the men&#8217;s rights movement might help explain his actions, but his actions wouldn&#8217;t tell us anything meaningful about the men&#8217;s rights movement, any more than it would tell us anything meaningful about gun owners, the mentally ill, mixed race asian/white people, BMW owners, UC Santa Barbara students, or <em>Game of Thrones</em> fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Egalitarian		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2014/05/elliot-rodgers-motive-says-very-little-about-anyone-except-elliot-rodger/#comment-13564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egalitarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 03:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windypundit.com/?p=7129#comment-13564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no proof at all that Elliot Rodger was involved in the men’s rights movement.

The forums he’s been found to have posted to, a bodybuilder forum and “PUAhate”, are not connected to the MRM.

His youtube subscriptions, cited as proof of a connection, do not include a single men’s rights channel.

Furthermore, none of his beliefs have anything to do with men&#039;s rights views.

There’s a reason why no source has been able to point to even one specific example of a connection to the men’s rights movement. There is no such connection.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no proof at all that Elliot Rodger was involved in the men’s rights movement.</p>
<p>The forums he’s been found to have posted to, a bodybuilder forum and “PUAhate”, are not connected to the MRM.</p>
<p>His youtube subscriptions, cited as proof of a connection, do not include a single men’s rights channel.</p>
<p>Furthermore, none of his beliefs have anything to do with men&#8217;s rights views.</p>
<p>There’s a reason why no source has been able to point to even one specific example of a connection to the men’s rights movement. There is no such connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-06-26 17:59:24 by W3 Total Cache
-->