• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

“I’ve got mine, Jack!” Is a Lie

April 9, 2013 By Mark Draughn 3 Comments

I’ve heard Stephen Colbert summarize the Objectivist mindset — and by extension, libertarian mindset — as “I’ve got mine, Jack!” This is true as far as it goes, but it is also a lie by omission.

Consider this story in the Wall Street Journal:

There’s no free lunch, goes the old saying. The IRS may take that literally.

The Internal Revenue Service is looking into the “free lunches” that companies like Google Yahoo Facebook , and other Silicon Valley heavyweights provide to their employees, and whether those meals should be subject to taxation.

“It appears for a lot of these companies that they’re not actually including (them) in their employees paychecks or W-2s and therefore the question is whether there’s some skirting of the tax laws,”

I think that illustrates the government mindset pretty well, which could perhaps be summarized as “Oh, you’ve got nice stuff! I’m going to take some.”

You see, what Stephen Colbert and other critics leave out is that libertarians always follow “I’ve got mine” with “and you’ve got yours.” Leaving that out makes libertarianism seem pretty selfish.

To be fair, Ayn Rand also criticized people for giving in to their altruistic impulse, as if helping the needy was some kind of weakness. Then again, even the staunchest Ayn Rand disciple wouldn’t have done this:

In 2006, the City of Las Vegas became locked in a bizarre war with homeless advocates, and decided that no one should be engaging in charity in the public parks. The City began ticketing good Samaritans who shared food with more than 24 people, under the belief that giving food to people already in the public park violated statutes requiring permits for gatherings of 25 or more people. When the ACLU of Nevada took issue with this interpretation of permit laws, the City took a more direct approach: it explicitly outlawed the sharing of food with anyone who looked poor…

Other homeless individuals were being kicked out of parks under a questionable trespass policy called “86”ing, where Park Marshals essentially took photographs of certain people – almost always homeless people – who were then kicked out of the public parks on pain of a trespass misdemeanor if they returned. The 86ing process had no paperwork, no right to appeal, and no due process whatsoever.

I’m not even sure how to summarize that mindset…maybe “How dare you help the poor yourself! You should be paying us to help them.”

(Hat tip: Reason 24/7)

Related

Share This Post

Filed Under: Libertarianism

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jeff Gamso says

    April 9, 2013 at 9:24 am

    You probably give Las Vegas too much credit when you say that it insists that it alone provide for the needs of the poor.

    The real message, I suspect, is that it doesn’t give a rat’s ass for the poor and that anyone giving them sustenance induces them to stick around rather than either dying or migrating to a less heartless community. And of course, if they’re in a public park . . . .

    Might have been OK if they were being fed on a poorly lit-street corner in a ghetto.

    Reply
  2. Nigel Declan says

    May 12, 2013 at 12:04 am

    I assume that you are aware that Stephen Colbert is not a real pundit, merely someone who satirizes real (mostly conservative) pundits. Suggesting that Stephen Colbert is lying by omission is akin to suggesting that Bob Newhart is lying because he is not actually talking on the telephone during his comedy routine. Technically, the criticism is correct, but it misunderstands the role of the speaker and imputes to him some sort of duty to describe libertarianism in a manner that is both accurate and consistent with your definition of libertarianism. Furthermore, you seem to be the one suggesting that Colbert’s opinions on objectivism (which, given Ayn Rand’s apparent revulsion towards altruism and charity, certainly doesn’t seem to necessarily involve the “you’ve got yours” aspect) are necessarily a commentary on libertarianism. It seems, therefore, that Colbert has made a perfectly reasonable commentary on one political/philosophical view which, although perhaps related, is distinct from libertarianism; you, however, have decided to impute his statements as lying (albeit by omission) about the political/philosophical view to which you subscribe.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Post Pandemic Poem – אסכולת הכורסא says:
    January 30, 2021 at 9:39 am

    […] though our woes seem oversized,and future questions unsurmised,I'm calmer, Jack, I got my own;I rolled my sleeve and got me […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Chicago Metro Area Covid Status

Recent Posts

  • ChatGPT the Hobbyist?
  • Ivy R.I.P.
  • Assault Weapon Ban Theater
  • Still Here
  • WindyTHINK
  • What Marjorie Taylor Green doesn’t know about masks… or underwear
  • Burning Down Twitter
  • Netchoice, Pruneyard, and the digital public square

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • Agitator
  • DrugWar Rant
  • Duly Noted
  • Dynamist
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Blawgs

  • a Public Defender
  • appellatesquawk
  • Blonde Justice
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Defending People
  • DUI Blog
  • ECIL Crime
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Hercules and the Umpire
  • Indefensible
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Probable Cause
  • Seeking Justice
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Clements Firm
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate
  • West Virginia Criminal Law Blog

Bloggers

  • Booker Rising
  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Miss Manners
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Roger Ebert's Journal
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Altruist
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • W3 EDGE, Optimization Products for WordPress
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Gone But Not Forgotten

  • Peter McWilliams

Copyright © 2023 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress

Go to mobile version