<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Blogger Without a Clue	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2012/05/a_blogger_without_a_clue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2012/05/a_blogger_without_a_clue/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Marshall		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2012/05/a_blogger_without_a_clue/#comment-2496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=2187#comment-2496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the commentary, Mark. I haven&#039;t filed any complaint, because I&#039;m still willing to believe that Prevost will get over her embarrassment and do the right thing, which would be to apologize,and take down the post.

 I do think that what she did triggers legitimate questions about professional trustworthiness and honesty, but I&#039;m whipsawed a bit between the jurisdictions....in fact, I&#039;m working on this problem for an upcoming legal seminar. DC lawyers are supposed to report other lawyers whom we have good reason to believe are dishonest, but what if the state involved would never do anything about a complaint on this topic, and the fact of the complaint is the equivalent of batting a hornet&#039;s nest? I&#039;m reliably advised that California is suspicious of disciplinary complaints ( as being used as leverage) when there is an underlying potential for a court action, in this case, willful copyright theft.

And you know, if she does farm out her blog posts, it&#039;s possible that she doesn&#039;t know anything about blogging. Though that part of her attack bothered me too...even more than the suggestion that I was &quot;off my meds.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the commentary, Mark. I haven&#8217;t filed any complaint, because I&#8217;m still willing to believe that Prevost will get over her embarrassment and do the right thing, which would be to apologize,and take down the post.</p>
<p> I do think that what she did triggers legitimate questions about professional trustworthiness and honesty, but I&#8217;m whipsawed a bit between the jurisdictions&#8230;.in fact, I&#8217;m working on this problem for an upcoming legal seminar. DC lawyers are supposed to report other lawyers whom we have good reason to believe are dishonest, but what if the state involved would never do anything about a complaint on this topic, and the fact of the complaint is the equivalent of batting a hornet&#8217;s nest? I&#8217;m reliably advised that California is suspicious of disciplinary complaints ( as being used as leverage) when there is an underlying potential for a court action, in this case, willful copyright theft.</p>
<p>And you know, if she does farm out her blog posts, it&#8217;s possible that she doesn&#8217;t know anything about blogging. Though that part of her attack bothered me too&#8230;even more than the suggestion that I was &#8220;off my meds.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-05-01 05:10:25 by W3 Total Cache
-->