• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Turkey Tom Lawsuit

October 13, 2010 By Ken Gibson Leave a Comment

It’s still October, but it’s not too early to get into a Thanksgiving atmosphere. Jimmy John’s is suing Halsted Street Deli (a local sandwich shop here in Chicago) over the names of two sandwiches. Jimmy John’s uses the sandwich names “Turkey Tom” and “Hunter’s Club” while Halsted Street Deli uses “Tom Turkey” and “Hunt Club”.

I don’t know. I understand that trademarks need to be defended, but just how is it that you can trademark a name like Turkey Tom anyway? Since Tom is the common name for a male turkey, and any turkey sub is likely to have similar ingredients, I just don’t see how you can lay claim to any sandwich that uses the words Tom and Turkey in them. The same logic seems to apply to Hunt Club as well.
When Jimmy John’s decided to use words that were already commonly associated with their products, it seems as if they were copying an already established common theme and have no right to claim that theme as their own just because they are now a commercial success. When I was involved in a new product design our lawyers advised us to make sure that the names were unique, perhaps making up words not in the language just to be sure we could get a defensible trademark.
If they had used the name “Turkey Jim” I could understand a trademark. Of course then we would be reading about Jimmy John’s being sued by Slim Jim’s over their turkey jerky products.
Since Jimmy John’s can’t make a decent sandwich, they survive by marketing instead. Perhaps they should focus on making good sandwiches instead of suing their way to profit.

Filed Under: Legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Swift Falling
  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress