<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Cost of Murder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2010/10/the_cost_of_murder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2010/10/the_cost_of_murder/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Newbie		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2010/10/the_cost_of_murder/#comment-2176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Newbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=1912#comment-2176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;And if you&#039;re going to consider the costs paid by the murderer, shouldn&#039;t you also consider the benefits? After all, murderers kill for a reason. They kill for the same reason anybody does anything: To improve the quality of their lives. The victim of a murder is worse off, but the murderer himself is better off for having gotten rid of a cheating spouse or a rival drug dealer. He may not be better off in prison, but prison is a risk, not a certain cost.&quot;

Most murders are spur of the moment crimes of passion, that do not fall into your categorizing.  The vast majority of murderers would never kill again. Fact is 80% + of them received no true benefit. I am not condoning their actions or the end result of their actions. 


I question your logic when you say that prison is a risk, not a cost. Prison is definitely a cost to anyone in there.  If there is no value/cost then there can be no risk. There is no risk when there is nothing to lose. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And if you&#8217;re going to consider the costs paid by the murderer, shouldn&#8217;t you also consider the benefits? After all, murderers kill for a reason. They kill for the same reason anybody does anything: To improve the quality of their lives. The victim of a murder is worse off, but the murderer himself is better off for having gotten rid of a cheating spouse or a rival drug dealer. He may not be better off in prison, but prison is a risk, not a certain cost.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most murders are spur of the moment crimes of passion, that do not fall into your categorizing.  The vast majority of murderers would never kill again. Fact is 80% + of them received no true benefit. I am not condoning their actions or the end result of their actions. </p>
<p>I question your logic when you say that prison is a risk, not a cost. Prison is definitely a cost to anyone in there.  If there is no value/cost then there can be no risk. There is no risk when there is nothing to lose. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-06-14 19:11:38 by W3 Total Cache
-->