Comments on: Photography Is Not a Crime https://windypundit.com/2009/10/photography_is_not_a_crime/ Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind. Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:33:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4 By: Mark Draughn https://windypundit.com/2009/10/photography_is_not_a_crime/#comment-1840 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:33:49 +0000 https://windypundit.com/?p=1703#comment-1840 Yes way! I’m a bit rushed for time, but I think the case law says a police officer can require you to identify yourself only if he has reasonable suspicion that you’re up to something (admittedly a very low hurdle) and if there’s a state law granting him that power. I think about half the states don’t have stop-and-identify laws, so “except maybe” means it depends which state you’re in.

]]> By: KipEsquire https://windypundit.com/2009/10/photography_is_not_a_crime/#comment-1839 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:15:01 +0000 https://windypundit.com/?p=1703#comment-1839 “Except maybe for the ID..”

No way Jose! See Brown v. Texas, Kolender v. Lawson and Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Circuit.

]]>