<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Eric Turkewitz Still Matters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2009/07/why_eric_turkewitz_still_matte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2009/07/why_eric_turkewitz_still_matte/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric T		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2009/07/why_eric_turkewitz_still_matte/#comment-1729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=1633#comment-1729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;We&#039;ll probably hear more criticism of Sotomeyor about this issue from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Republican politicians, and Fox News...&lt;/i&gt;

Or not. &#039;Twas a small issue to start and it stayed that way (as it should).

I thought it would be interstesting to see a SCOTUS nominee wrestle with the kinds of details that thousands of small practitioners deal with, starting with things like their &quot;official&quot; names, letterhead, registrations, conflict checks and more.

Many of the answers will never appear, because the questions were never asked. While the answers may not have mattered in the long run, at least there was likely to have been some substance if they had been asked. Unlike the non-answers that were given while Senators tried to impress their constituents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We&#8217;ll probably hear more criticism of Sotomeyor about this issue from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Republican politicians, and Fox News&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Or not. &#8216;Twas a small issue to start and it stayed that way (as it should).</p>
<p>I thought it would be interstesting to see a SCOTUS nominee wrestle with the kinds of details that thousands of small practitioners deal with, starting with things like their &#8220;official&#8221; names, letterhead, registrations, conflict checks and more.</p>
<p>Many of the answers will never appear, because the questions were never asked. While the answers may not have mattered in the long run, at least there was likely to have been some substance if they had been asked. Unlike the non-answers that were given while Senators tried to impress their constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carolyn Elefant		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2009/07/why_eric_turkewitz_still_matte/#comment-1728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carolyn Elefant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=1633#comment-1728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am a huge Eric Turkewitz fan - thank you for giving him the recognition he deserves.  I too was disappointed that the NYT did not give credit where it was due.

BTW, Eric is too humble.  It wasn&#039;t just that he uncovered an interesting fact, but actually, in typical Turkewitz-fashion, he took the time to research and analyze the issue -which elevated his post from one merely passing on gossip to real investigation and analysis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge Eric Turkewitz fan &#8211; thank you for giving him the recognition he deserves.  I too was disappointed that the NYT did not give credit where it was due.</p>
<p>BTW, Eric is too humble.  It wasn&#8217;t just that he uncovered an interesting fact, but actually, in typical Turkewitz-fashion, he took the time to research and analyze the issue -which elevated his post from one merely passing on gossip to real investigation and analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shg		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2009/07/why_eric_turkewitz_still_matte/#comment-1727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=1633#comment-1727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And if I wanted a legal opinion on ethics, I would most assuredly go to the Turk before Gillers.  Any day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if I wanted a legal opinion on ethics, I would most assuredly go to the Turk before Gillers.  Any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-06-06 04:27:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->