<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Immigration Analogies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2007/08/over_at_illinois_review_john/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/08/over_at_illinois_review_john/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 23:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Draughn		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/08/over_at_illinois_review_john/#comment-820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Draughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 23:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=916#comment-820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I responded to Phil&#039;s comment &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2010/05/so_what_if_its_illegal.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I responded to Phil&#8217;s comment <a href="http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2010/05/so_what_if_its_illegal.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/08/over_at_illinois_review_john/#comment-819</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=916#comment-819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first analogy makes some sense, but the follow up analogy is absurd, since it ignores the fact that the person is in the country ILLEGALLY.  Why is that such a hard concept for some people?  Unless of course you feel that laws are only meant as guidelines, and you get to pick the laws that you will follow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first analogy makes some sense, but the follow up analogy is absurd, since it ignores the fact that the person is in the country ILLEGALLY.  Why is that such a hard concept for some people?  Unless of course you feel that laws are only meant as guidelines, and you get to pick the laws that you will follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-07-09 05:54:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->