<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Paris Hilton Getting Screwed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://windypundit.com/2007/06/paris_hilton_getting_screwed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/06/paris_hilton_getting_screwed/</link>
	<description>Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Windypundit		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/06/paris_hilton_getting_screwed/#comment-655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Windypundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=854#comment-655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The comment I linked to also claims that it&#039;s unusual for judges to impose those kinds of restrictions on sentences.  Judge Suaer claims he did it in this case because Paris wouldn&#039;t be punished sufficiently by home confinement, yet he doesn&#039;t impose that requirement on other wealthy defendants.  Only on Paris.

Also, I&#039;m not convinced the judge&#039;s sentencing order was entirely legal under California law (although I&#039;d change my mind if I heard otherwise from someone with real knowledge).  Many prison systems have been successful in getting the legislature to prevent judicial oversight.  I think that&#039;s to prevent the prosecution, defense, and judge from creating plea agreements that saddle the prison system with detailed custody conditions for every single inmate.

I don&#039;t know.  I could be totally wrong, but I just keep getting the feeling that some people see &quot;being tough on Paris Hilton&quot; as a way to gain a little celebrity for themselves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment I linked to also claims that it&#8217;s unusual for judges to impose those kinds of restrictions on sentences.  Judge Suaer claims he did it in this case because Paris wouldn&#8217;t be punished sufficiently by home confinement, yet he doesn&#8217;t impose that requirement on other wealthy defendants.  Only on Paris.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not convinced the judge&#8217;s sentencing order was entirely legal under California law (although I&#8217;d change my mind if I heard otherwise from someone with real knowledge).  Many prison systems have been successful in getting the legislature to prevent judicial oversight.  I think that&#8217;s to prevent the prosecution, defense, and judge from creating plea agreements that saddle the prison system with detailed custody conditions for every single inmate.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know.  I could be totally wrong, but I just keep getting the feeling that some people see &#8220;being tough on Paris Hilton&#8221; as a way to gain a little celebrity for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KipEsquire		</title>
		<link>https://windypundit.com/2007/06/paris_hilton_getting_screwed/#comment-654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KipEsquire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windypundit.com/?p=854#comment-654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Normally, with a non-celebrity, he would neither care nor know that someone he sentenced had been released early.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Judges always care when their express, and entirely legal, sentencing orders are flagrantly disobeyed by the sheriff -- who is now inarguably in contempt of court and should be punished for such.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Normally, with a non-celebrity, he would neither care nor know that someone he sentenced had been released early.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Judges always care when their express, and entirely legal, sentencing orders are flagrantly disobeyed by the sheriff &#8212; who is now inarguably in contempt of court and should be punished for such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: windypundit.com @ 2026-06-05 22:26:24 by W3 Total Cache
-->