Comments on: Ron Paul Fumbles the Ball for the Libertarian Team

By: Mark Draughn

Mark Draughn — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:17:38 +0000

Hey, I didn’t actually see the debate, but people made it sound like Guiliani nailed him on a “gotcha” soundbyte. I hate the fact that people can get nailed on stuff like that instead of debating substantive issues, but that’s the way it seems to be.

By: Rox

Rox — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:00:00 +0000

Paul is an excellent debator. He didn’t “sound” like he was blaming our policy in Iraq for 9/11, he was quoting the 9/11 Commission report that this is/was indeed the case. Paul came off like the honest statesman that he is. Guiliani sounded like the snickering slimball that he is. And how is having one’s city blown up a “qualification” for anything? How utterly ridiculous…

By: radiofriendly

radiofriendly — Wed, 16 May 2007 06:22:45 +0000

Ron Paul is more conservative than those other candidates could dream of. Do your home work. Most intellectual conservatives were against this war before it started in 2003. Did you know that? Pat Buchanan, Charley Reese, “is a prescription for the decline and fall of the American empire. Overextension – urged on by a bunch of rabid intellectuals who wouldn’t know one end of a gun from another” Paul Craig Roberts, who was one of the highest-ranking Treasury Department officials under President Reagan and now a nationally-syndicated conservative columnist, wrote: “an invasion of Iraq is likely the most thoughtless action in modern history.” On and on and these quotes are from 2002! This war was Undeclared, un-provoked, liberal “nation building” I know it is hard, but we, as conservatives, have got to do some deep thinking about this issue and wake up!