• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • My Social Media
  • About
    • About Mark Draughn
    • Testimonials
    • Other Authors
      • About Gary Olson
      • About Ken Gibson
      • About Joel Rosenberg
    • Disclosures
    • Terms and Conditions

Windypundit

Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind.

Too Much SWAT, Part 1

July 27, 2006 By Mark Draughn 4 Comments

In response to an article I wrote last month about Police Shootings that Make You Go Hmmmm…, a commenter named Erick writes:

I’ve been on the Chicago Police SWAT team now without incident for over a year. SWAT teams don’t just take random phone calls from anonymous callers, gear up and go smashing in peoples doors. If this were the only criteria people would call in false claims on their neighbor for not picking up their dog crap. Furthermore, SWAT officers are hand selected from a pool of numerous candidates each of whom are vigorously tested and backgrounds checked.

First of all, thank you Erick for taking the time to respond to a blow-hard like me. I don’t know a lot about police procedures, organization, and tactics, but here in the blogosphere we don’t let things like that that stop us from offering our opinion.

Second, I’m not surprised you haven’t seen any ugly incidents. You’re on the Chicago SWAT team. I can’t find much about the Chicago SWAT team online (which is probably a good thing) but I assume that a city the size of Chicago—and which is a known terrorist target—has a very professional SWAT team. [Update: Not quite. See Erick’s comment on this post.] Of the nearly 300 botched raids listed on the CATO raid map, only two of them—both wrong-house raids in which no one was seriously hurt—were in Chicago, and according to the source newspaper articles, neither of these involved the SWAT team.

Not all SWAT teams are as good as you are seeing here in Chicago. The town of Anderson, South Carolina has a SWAT team despite a population of only 25,000. [Update: Kelly in the comments says the SWAT team is associated with the much larger Anderson County.] They probably got federal anti-terror or anti-drug money for that. I’m sure the Anderson police are a fine bunch of people, but they’re just not going to be as highly trained as Chicago’s SWAT team.

I don’t blame the officers for this. The weapons and training are provided free by the federal government to police departments meeting certain broad criteria. If I were a cop, I’d sure take advantage of a government-funded opportunity to get that kind of equipment. Some of that equipment could be very useful. It would also be very, very cool.

Lots of cops apparently think the same way, because in some small towns, every single officer is on the SWAT team and has an M-16 fully-automatic assault rifle available to him.

Third, you say that “SWAT teams don’t just take random phone calls from anonymous callers, gear up and go smashing in peoples doors.” No, but in some places SWAT teams gear up and go smashing in peoples doors based on a request from another police unit (narcotics, vice) that does take tips from anonymous informants, confidential informants, or arrested criminals trying to make a deal. All of those people can sometimes make stuff up.

Erick had more to say, and so do I, but that’s all I have time for right now.

Update: Part 2 is now up.

Filed Under: Crime and Punishment

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Erick says

    July 30, 2006 at 12:22 pm

    Thanks for the reply and nuetrality. Up until a year ago Chicago employed a part time SWAT team that has just gone full time. We are begining to do the high risk warrants that were normally left in the hands of the district level personnel that developed the warrant. Furthermore it is common practice for us to do the entries for such units as narcotics and the like. SWAT is merely a safe way to enter and clear a building using the most advanced tactics and equipment available to ensure the safest outcome for all involved. This includes the suspected criminal inside. Also, it has been a proven statistic that suspects are more likely to surrender without incident seeing a SWAT team outside his or her door rather than just a patrol car or two.

    Reply
  2. Dana says

    March 8, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    I’m still in high school, but I’ve started looking at colleges in Illinois to major in Criminal Justice. I really want to be on the CPD SWAT team someday, and I had a few questions. I was wondering first and foremost the probability of a female being hired onto SWAT. I understand the physical requirements and I’m more than prepared to meet them, however I want to know if its even worth trying. Another question I had was how long it took you to get onto SWAT? I’m sure you had a certain number of years or something that you were required to be employed with the CPD but any information would be appreciated. I’m extremely curious how the SWAT team in Chicago works, so thank you for taking the time.

    Reply
  3. Kelly says

    December 3, 2009 at 7:49 am

    I live in Anderson SC. The population for the city is correct, but the city is a very small portion of the county (Anderson County) that the SWAT team serves also, the total population is about 182, 825.

    Reply
  4. Mark Draughn says

    December 3, 2009 at 8:29 am

    Kelly, thanks for your comment. I have added a note about this to the body of the post.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Swift Falling
  • Renovations
  • A familiar war in Iran
  • On the shooting of Renee Good
  • Swift Descending
  • GOA on Trump
  • Yes, It’s a Bribe
  • Talking to my fellow libertarians about DOGE

Where else to find me

  • Twitter
  • Post
  • Mastodon

Bloggy Goodness

  • DrugWar Rant
  • Hit & Run
  • Honest Courtesan
  • Nobody's Business
  • Popehat

Blawgs

  • appellatesquawk
  • Chasing Truth. Catching Hell.
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Crime and Consequences Blog
  • Criminal Defense
  • CrimLaw
  • D.A. Confidential
  • Defending People
  • Gamso For the Defense
  • Graham Lawyer Blog
  • Koehler Law Blog
  • Legal Satyricon
  • New York Personal Injury Law Blog
  • Norm Pattis
  • Probable Cause
  • Simple Justice
  • Tempe Criminal Defense
  • The Civil Rights Lawyer
  • The Trial Warrior Blog
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Underdog Blog
  • Unwashed Advocate

Bloggers

  • Eric Zorn
  • ExCop-LawStudent
  • InstaPundit
  • Marathon Pundit
  • Speakeasy Blog
  • SWOP Chicago

Geek Stuff

  • Charlie's Diary
  • Google Blogoscoped
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Ancient Gaming Noob
  • The Daily WTF
  • xkcd

Resources

  • CIA World Factbook
  • Current Impact Risks
  • EFF: Bloggers
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jennifer Abel
  • StrategyPage
  • Wikipedia
  • WolframAlpha

Frozen in Amber

  • a Public Defender
  • Agitator
  • Bert P. Krages II
  • Dan Heller
  • Defending Dandelions
  • Indefensible
  • Last One Speaks
  • Leslie's Omnibus
  • not for the monosyllabic
  • Not Guilty
  • Preaching to the Choir
  • Ravings of a Feral Genius

Copyright © 2026 Mark Draughn · Magazine Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress