https://windypundit.com/2006/06/the_great_museum_flash_scam/ Classical liberalism, criminal laws, the war on drugs, economics, free speech, technology, photography, sex work, cats, and whatever else comes to mind. Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:53:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://windypundit.com/2006/06/the_great_museum_flash_scam/#comment-367 Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:53:03 +0000 http://www.windypundit.com/?p=435#comment-367 Well, let’s consider for a moment:
If the ambient exposure was (and I am recalling a local gallery with normal lighting) f2.8 at 1 second (ISO 100)and the flash exposure was f8 then the following math applies:
f2.8 = 1 second
f4 = 2 times more light (2 seconds)
f5.6 = 2 times more light (8 seconds)
f8 = two times more light (16 seconds)
While I agree that the damage theory is fairly silly, the reason the local gallery doesn’t like it is that it is ‘distracting’.
cheers,

]]>